David Buuck’s Very Bad, Awful 2021 and Now 2022

This afternoon, the Knox County Commission will have their work session. Last week, the Knox County School Board had an extensive meeting with angst, frustration with Knox County Law Director David Buuck and his offices handling. 

David Buuck, candidate for KNOX County Law Director at Center City Conservatives Republican Club 1/23/2020

David Buuck, candidate for KNOX County Law Director at Center City Conservatives Republican Club 1/23/2020

Buuck answered via a two page letter. to Kristi Kristy, School Board Chair and Betsy Henderson, Knox County Board of Education. Re: M.B., ET AL, v. Governor Bill Lee, ET AL., U.S.D.C. NO. 3:21-CV-317

“I am in receipt of your letter of February 9, 2022 and am responding thereto, 

I fully understand the angst you must be feeling as elected representatives of your respective school board districts. I, personally, have the same feelings as do many of your district constituents and the County as a whole, who have elected me to represent them, as well. 

Having said that, I move to address your assertions. Initially, there is a misunderstanding with what you call our “latest plan.” The items you set out were not recommended plans from this Office. We have said time and again that we do not make policy for Knox County Schools, nor do we have authority over its personnel.  Rather, these were posited to you as potential far-reaching remedies which could be imposed by the federal Eastern District Court. This Office did not recommend the School Board institute such policies. 

Next, you indicate that this Office has not produced one medical expert. As has been discussed with Board Members, although we have been preparing for an eventual motion to reconsider the injunction when supported by exposure numbers, there has not been a date set by the district court for an evidentiary hearing, and one will likely not set until the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled on our appeal of Judge Greer’s order. The only opportunity to present evidentiary proof thus far in this case has been at the September 15 hearing. At that time, there was no medical evidence that could have been presented to the court which the court would have believed to counter the plaintiff’s proof that masking, along with other actions, lowered the transmission rate of COVID-19. Our own Knox County Health Department supported this proposition, and still does. And remember that Dr. Buchanan, at that time both Health Officer and Medical Director for Knox County, was also the medical director of Knox County Schools. we would have been put in the position of arguing against the very recommendations made by our own school system’s medical director. 

You also ask this Office to hire “expert” outside counsel in the pending case. The problem is that some of the best “expert” counsel counsel with regard to how the ADA is applied in an educational setting and appellate procedure are lodged in this Office. You have also been made aware of the law in this county as set out by Chancellor Sharon Bell in 2003, wherein she held the school board could not hire outside counsel. Even if possible, the hiring of outside counsel would cause significant additional expense and would only replicate that which our Office has already filed. In addition, we have consistently said we welcome groups and their attorneys to intervene in the case as amicus curiae (friends of the court).

You further criticize our Office for not immediately moving the court to lift the mask mandate for three basic reasons: (1) declining COVID rates nationwide, (2) because other jurisdictions that previously had stringent masking requirements are beginning to relax them, and (3) because some people are saying that masks are not effective. You offer newspaper articles as proof that Judge Greer should reverse his mask mandate. News articles are, by definition, hearsay evidence, and therefore not admissible in court. Also, the Knox County Health Department and the State Health Department, as experts, and currently tracking with the CDC, recommend masks in schools and support the arguments of the Plaintiffs. I would also refer you to the Tennessee Department of Health website wherein DOH continues to recommend masks and state that masks reduce the spread of COVID, here. The positions of these governmental entities are admissible and would quickly be brought to the court’s attention by Plaintiffs’ counsel. 

As a final note, although you are free to express your individual opinions on the campaign trail and otherwise, you have no authority to represent the KCBOE outside of what the full Board has approved. I point out that what you request is contrary to the Motion passes at the February 9, 2022 meeting that “the Law Department do everything they feel is possible as quickly as they can that doe not violate rules or jeopardize the case.

This Office is following that direction of the Board and will continue to do so. 

DLB/kfc

cc: Glenn Jacobs, Knox County Mayor

      Bob Thomas, Knox County Schools Superintendent

      Knox County Commissioners

      Knox County Board of Education Members

 

page one

page one

page two

page two


You may also like...

1 Response

  1. James Corcoran says:

    Buuck is 100 percent right.